Ian Walker

Ian Walker – Founder/ Director/ Solicitor/ Mediator/ Arbitrator

Relocation – Within UK

Relocation cases can be very difficult and hotly contested. The normal scenario is that one parent wishes to move to a different part of the country or overseas and this is opposed by the other parent because of the disruption that will be caused to their relationship with their children.

This page deals with relocation cases within the UK. There is a page on relocation outside of the UK here.

If there is an existing Child Arrangements Order and the parent wishes to relocate the child outside of the UK – then they need to obtain the permission of the other parent – or a new court order.

There is no equivalent provision for relocation within the UK – but if there is an existing Child Arrangements Order which sets out arrangements by which children spend time with the parent who is not moving – then the order will need to be varied.

It is generally expected that a parent who has parental responsibility for their children should consult with and reach legal 500 leading firm logoagreement with others with parental responsibility – which would normally include the other parent and seek agreement prior to the move.

A unilateral move where the other parent has not been consulted or even notified will normally be frowned upon by the court.

Here is a link to the judicial protocol which relates to moves between England and Wales, and Scotland and vice versa.

Historically moves within the UK were treated differently to relocation outside of the UK

Historically the court would only restrict a parent’s right to live anywhere in the UK in exceptional circumstances. This interpretation of the law was reviewed by the Court of Appeal in 2015 and the Court of Appeal took the view that the law relating to internal relocation cases within the UK and external/international relocation cases was the same.

What the law says about internal relocation

Essentially the law is that the court will apply the welfare checklist in the Children Act to the specific facts of each individual case.

In other words, the move needs to be justified on the basis that it is in the child’s welfare. The court will therefore be extremely interested in the impact of the move on the relationship between the child and their other parent.

The court clearly has a lot of discretion and success or failure of an application will depend upon how well the evidence in support of the move or against the move is put together and how well the case is presented.

Whilst the law is broad – the courts have from time to time given guidance as to how each application might be considered. This page was written in December 2020. At this time the guidance suggests that the judge considering the case should ask the following questions to help them clarify whether the move is justified and in the child’s interests:

(the questions are framed on the basis that the child’s mother is seeking to move the child):

  1. is the mother’s application genuine in the sense that it is not motivated by some selfish desire to exclude the father from the child’s life?
  2. is the mother’s application realistically founded on practical proposals both well researched and investigated?
  3. what would be the impact on the mother, either as the single parent or as a new wife, of a refusal of her realistic proposal?
  4. is the father’s opposition motivated by genuine concern for the future of the child’s welfare or is it driven by some ulterior motive?
  5. what would be the extent of the detriment to him and his future relationship with the child were the application granted?
  6. to what extent would that detriment be offset by extension of the child’s relationships with the maternal family and homeland?
  7. since the circumstances in which such decisions have to be made vary infinitely and the judge in each case has to be free to decide whatever is in the best interests of the child, such guidance should not be applied rigidly as if it contains principles from which no departure is permitted
  8. there is no legal principle, let alone some legal or evidential presumption, in favour of an application to relocate by a primary carer. The old statements which seem to favour applications to relocate made by primary carers are no more than a reflection of the reality of the human condition and the parent-child relationship
  9. the hearing must not get mired in taxonomical arguments or preliminary skirmishes as to what label should be applied to the case by virtue of either the time spent with each of the parents or other aspects of the care arrangements

These cases can be extremely emotive. Anyone who is thinking of relocating or faced with the possibility of a relocation should seek legal advice.

These cases do not have to end up in court

If the court allows the move or if the move is agreed – how contact arrangements work will in the future be a significant consideration. Whatever is agreed or ordered – the parents will then need to make work (for the benefit of their children).

If the move is genuinely motivated – then the case could be very suitable for collaborative family law for family mediation. Possibly more for collaborative family law as having the lawyers very much in the process could be extremely valuable/helpful.

But whatever the situation – it must be remembered that all cases are different and specific legal advice should be sought.

More on this topic

Judicial Protocol for Children’s Cases in Scotland, and England and Wales
Judicial Protocol for Children’s Cases in Scotland, and England and Wales

Here is a link to the 2018 protocol

Read more
Contact us to make an appointment
Contact us to make an appointment

Here is a link to our contact page

Read more
Team

Meet our team of children law experts

Read more
Children Law
Children Law

We are experts in the law relating to children

Read more

Latest News

Somerset woman: Domestic abuse story is a lesson

A Somerset woman has told of the abuse she suffered at the hands of her partner, after he was found guilty of assaulting her. The woman has publicised her story as a warning to others not to ignore ‘red flags’ in relationships.

Read more
No-fault divorce and mediation: taking the pain out of divorce

It goes without saying that divorce can be a painful experience. Much of that pain can be caused by conflict during the process, leading to stressful contested court proceedings. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Read more
Even if you have agreed your divorce settlement, you still need a court order

With the advent of online divorce more and more people are doing their own divorce, especially since no-fault divorce has made the process considerably simpler. And having dealt with the divorce themselves, many are tempted to go one step

Read more
No-fault divorce is great, but don’t forget the financial settlement

It is almost universally agreed that the introduction of no-fault divorce has been a good thing. Gone are the days when someone wanting a divorce has had to lay the blame for the breakdown of the marriage upon their spouse.

Read more
Marriage decline shows importance of cohabitants knowing their rights

On the 19th May the Office for National Statistics (‘ONS’) published its latest annual figures for the number of marriages that took place in England and Wales, for the year 2019. The figures show a continuing decline in marriage rates.

Read more
Dorset council exposed woman to risk of abuse from father

When a local authority has concerns over the welfare of a child it will usually assign a social worker to get in touch with the family and investigate the matter. When this happens, it is of course essential that the parents

Read more
Johnny Depp v Amber Heard: playing out your private life in public

For the last month the world has eagerly watched the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard defamation trial, as the two actors have exchanged lurid alleged details of their private lives. Seeing two Hollywood stars fighting out such a battle in court

Read more
Should Olivia Wilde have been served with child custody papers whilst on stage?

When the actress Olivia Wilde was recently served with child custody papers whilst on stage it caused something of a sensation. Surely, said many, she should not have been served publicly, whilst she was working?

Read more
How Exeter City’s persistence is a lesson for all during family court proceedings.

Many congratulations to Exeter City F.C, who last week secured automatic promotion from League Two. And the Grecians’ success came after five years of promotion near-misses, including being beaten in the final of the play-off in 2017, 2018

Read more
We are Recruiting x 3; Marketing Assistant, PA, Paralegal

We are Recruiting x 3; Marketing Assistant, PA, Paralegal The past 2 years have seen us achieve significant growth and we have firmly established ourselves as a leading regional family law solicitors practice. This year we will be joined by some additional team members who will further strengthen our team. First of these is Emma […]

Read more
Somerset Council failed to comply with adoption requirements

Somerset Council failed to comply with adoption requirements A recent High Court case has highlighted serious failures on the part of Somerset County Council to comply with the legal requirements when it has been acting as an adoption agency. Adoption agencies are organisations that work with prospective parents and children to assess, match, arrange and […]

Read more
Do I have to attend a MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting)?

Do I have to attend a MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting)? Anyone wishing to apply to the court about a family matter must first attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (commonly known by the acronym ‘MIAM’), unless an exemption applies. As the name suggests, the purpose of the MIAM is to provide the […]

Read more