Lauren Preedy – Senior Solicitor – Head of Divorce Team
Whilst the divorce itself is normally reasonably straightforward, sorting out the future financial arrangements following a divorce or civil partnership dissolution normally the matter which requires most attention.
When a couple enter into a marriage or civil partnership each will acquire rights to be financially supported/provided for by the other. If/when the couple have children – then there are further obligations to provide for their children (or children that have been treated as children of the marriage/civil partnership).
When the marriage or civil partnership comes to an end, each is entitled to a fair financial settlement. What fairness means will be very individual to the circumstances of the couple and their family.
Ideally the couple will agree how their assets will be divided between them and what provision there will be (if any) for spousal maintenance and for child maintenance. Sometimes there will be a clean break between the couple – but this is not automatic.
Before any financial agreement between the couple is binding, it needs to be approved by a court. The court will not rubber-stamp what a couple agree. Instead the judge will need to be satisfied that the reasonable needs of each of the couple and their minor children have been met. There is more about the factors that the judge by law has to consider below.
Negotiated solutions are usually better
Ideally, the financial arrangements will be agreed through negotiation.
This could be with the assistance of mediation or collaborative family law. Sometimes the couple will ask a private judge to make a legally binding determination through the process of arbitration. But, if no agreement can be reached, then either of the couple may make an application to the court. There then follows a court process which will end with the financial order being made. There is a bit more about the procedure below.
But, sensibly negotiated and fair solutions should be just as fair as what may have been ordered by a court after an expensive and divisive court process. They will be achieved quicker and at less cost. Where a couple have children – the achievement of having reached a negotiated solution together will hopefully assist the couple working together
Call our experienced Family Law Solicitors, Divorce Lawyers or Mediators now
Finalising financial arrangements is normally a two-stage process. Firstly there is financial disclosure. Then after financial disclosure has taken place there is negotiation.
Both of the couple are under a duty to provide full financial disclosure. This can extend to having properties valued and obtaining valuations of pensions and other assets. Negotiation means making informed decisions – and this is not possible without full information.
Our specialist team
We have built a very strong specialist team of divorce lawyers – supported by our in-house accountant.
The Head of our divorce team – Lauren Preedy is the chair of the Somerset region of Resolution. Our team also includes other very experienced divorce lawyers. In our view our team is a strong as anyone else in the South-West.
Good legal practice is about finding fair solutions.
Couple separate because they are not getting on. The process of working out what will be a fair financial settlement can be stressful and it is very easy for this to contribute to relations between the couple getting even worse.
Whilst sometimes it is necessary to make an application to the court – a court application is not automatically the best way forward. The best way of achieving a solution will vary from case to case. A key factor will be the willingness of both of the couple to provide all relevant financial information and the willingness of both of the couple to enter into meaningful negotiations.
When either of a couple choose a solicitor – they want their solicitor to guide them through what could be a very challenging time, as nicely as possible – but with the confidence that the solicitor is on their side and is working for them to achieve a fair financial arrangement.
If sensible negotiations can be undertaken – then it may be that the only interaction with the court will be asking the court to approve what will have been agreed as being a fair settlement/final court order.
The negotiations could take place through principled negotiation through solicitors, collaborative family law, mediation (with legal advice in support of the mediation or the lawyers attending some of the mediation meetings) or through using arbitration (a private judge).
Some FAQs about divorce finance court cases
Who can apply to court for a divorce financial order?
Either spouse or civil partner can make an application to court to resolve financial disputes arising from divorce or civil partnership dissolution. The person making the application is the applicant and the other person is the respondent.
What happens when the application for a divorce finance order is received by the court?
When either of the couple makes the application to court, the court automatically generates certain standard procedural timetable (directions) through which the case will proceed. These will include:
the date and time for the first court hearing (sometimes referred to as a first directions appointment or first appointment)
that five weeks before the first court hearing each of the couple must each send a completed a completed financial disclosure form (Form E) to the court and to the other of the couple and/or their solicitor. The Form E is to gives full details of each of the couples financial circumstances together with supporting documentation.
then two weeks before first hearing each must each send to the court and exchange with the other party:
a short statement about what the disputed financial issues between them
a chronology of the important events in the marriage or civil partnership
a questionnaire if they have any queries on the other person’s financial disclosure, and
a form saying whether they will be using the first court hearing for further timetabling/procedural orders (e.g. seeking further financial information) or if will be able to negotiate to see if you can reach an agreement.
What happens at the first court appointment?
Unless the couple have both said they are in a position where they can negotiate, the first appointment is usually a procedural hearing. This is also known as a First Directions Appointment or FDA.
The judge will decide what additional steps need to be taken (usually related to financial information) to get the case ready so that meaningful negotiation can take place. Often this will mean the obtaining of report from a pension’s expert. Sometimes other experts are needed – for example to fix the value of property or other assets (for example a business).
Normally there is only one expert for each item where expert evidence is needed. This will be a single joint expert. If the lawyers cannot agree who the expert will be, then the judge will decide.
The court hearing will result in a timetable by which the various information required needs to be available and the court will fix a date for the next court hearing. In complicated cases there may need to be a further procedural hearing, but in most cases the judge will fix a date for what is called the Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing (FDR) – more about this below.
Before every court hearing, each party must file at court and exchange a statement of their legal costs.
What happens at the Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing (FDR)?
The FDR (financial dispute resolution) hearing is usually the second court appointment. It can sometimes take place at the first appointment, provided that both of the couple and their legal teams have all the information they need early on. Providing full information early will therefore save time and cost.
Essentially, the judge will try and assist negotiations. The judge is able to give an indication of what they would order if they were asked to decide the case on that day (without having her detailed evidence). This can assist negotiations – as it can give a reality check if one party is being completely unrealistic.
If an agreement is reached then the judge can approve the final order.
If no agreement is reached then the case then the judge will make further procedural orders so that the case is ready for final hearing. If possible the judge will set a date for the final hearing.
What happens at the final hearing?
The judge will hear evidence from each of the couple and any experts. Witnesses may be cross-examined.
At the end of the hearing each legal team will make submissions the judge saying what the judge should order and why.
The judge will then make a decision/order. The judge is entitled not to make a decision on the day – but to allow themselves to have time to have a think. That is unusual. In most cases a decision is made on the day or the judge says what his decision will be – but his full reasons will follow.
The judge is required to set out fully the reasons for his decision.
There is limited scope to have your costs paid by the other person in financial proceedings. The general rule is that each person pays their own legal fees.
What happens after the final hearing?
Unfortunately there is still work to be done after the final financial order.
Often obtaining the final divorce decree is the first task. If there are pensions involved then it is normal not to apply for the decree absolute until after there is agreement or the court has made a final financial order. This is because of the possible effect on pension rights/death benefits if the divorce was completed earlier.
The financial order will take effect after decree absolute.
The order will need to be implemented. This could include pension transfers in respect of pension sharing orders and the sale or transfer of properties.
If someone doesn’t comply with the order – there will also be the question of enforcement – making them do what they are supposed to.
In addition, if it comes to light that one of the party has lied about their financial position – then it may be possible to reopen the order. This wouldn’t mean quite going back to square one – but nearly. If that situation arose then there could also be big implications about costs.
Somerset woman: Domestic abuse story is a lesson
A Somerset woman has told of the abuse she suffered at the hands of her partner, after he was found guilty of assaulting her.
The woman has publicised her story as a warning to others not to ignore ‘red flags’ in relationships.
No-fault divorce and mediation: taking the pain out of divorce
It goes without saying that divorce can be a painful experience. Much of that pain can be caused by conflict during the process, leading to stressful contested court proceedings.
But it doesn’t have to be that way.
Even if you have agreed your divorce settlement, you still need a court order
With the advent of online divorce more and more people are doing their own divorce, especially since no-fault divorce has made the process considerably simpler.
And having dealt with the divorce themselves, many are tempted to go one step
No-fault divorce is great, but don’t forget the financial settlement
It is almost universally agreed that the introduction of no-fault divorce has been a good thing. Gone are the days when someone wanting a divorce has had to lay the blame for the breakdown of the marriage upon their spouse.
Marriage decline shows importance of cohabitants knowing their rights
On the 19th May the Office for National Statistics (‘ONS’) published its latest annual figures for the number of marriages that took place in England and Wales, for the year 2019.
The figures show a continuing decline in marriage rates.
Dorset council exposed woman to risk of abuse from father
When a local authority has concerns over the welfare of a child it will usually assign a social worker to get in touch with the family and investigate the matter.
When this happens, it is of course essential that the parents
Johnny Depp v Amber Heard: playing out your private life in public
For the last month the world has eagerly watched the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard defamation trial, as the two actors have exchanged lurid alleged details of their private lives.
Seeing two Hollywood stars fighting out such a battle in court
Should Olivia Wilde have been served with child custody papers whilst on stage?
When the actress Olivia Wilde was recently served with child custody papers whilst on stage it caused something of a sensation. Surely, said many, she should not have been served publicly, whilst she was working?
How Exeter City’s persistence is a lesson for all during family court proceedings.
Many congratulations to Exeter City F.C, who last week secured automatic promotion from League Two.
And the Grecians’ success came after five years of promotion near-misses, including being beaten in the final of the play-off in 2017, 2018
We are Recruiting x 3; Marketing Assistant, PA, Paralegal
We are Recruiting x 3; Marketing Assistant, PA, Paralegal The past 2 years have seen us achieve significant growth and we have firmly established ourselves as a leading regional family law solicitors practice. This year we will be joined by some additional team members who will further strengthen our team. First of these is Emma […]
Somerset Council failed to comply with adoption requirements
Somerset Council failed to comply with adoption requirements A recent High Court case has highlighted serious failures on the part of Somerset County Council to comply with the legal requirements when it has been acting as an adoption agency. Adoption agencies are organisations that work with prospective parents and children to assess, match, arrange and […]
Do I have to attend a MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting)?
Do I have to attend a MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting)? Anyone wishing to apply to the court about a family matter must first attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (commonly known by the acronym ‘MIAM’), unless an exemption applies. As the name suggests, the purpose of the MIAM is to provide the […]