Lauren Preedy – Head of our Divorce Team

Consent Orders

General principles

The courts encourage couples to reach amicable agreements to resolve the issues arising from their separation and divorce.

Where the arrangements for children are concerned – it is hoped that there will be no need for any court order. The Children Act 1989 contains the no order principle. This principle can be summarised to say that it is better for children if parents can find a way to work together such that the intervention of the court with the court order is not needed. To put it more simply – no Order is usually better than an Order.

This said – if the court can be persuaded that it is in the child’s best interests for there to be a court order to set out arrangements – then the court will make a court order.

The paragraphs that follow deal with financial consent orders.

Financial Consent Orders

Marriage creates a legal status and rights. When there is a divorce, each of the couple is entitled to make a financial claim against the other. It is therefore normal and usual for there to be a financial order at the time of a divorce which decides what should happen with these claims and potential claims. Often this is what is known as a clean break – although the final financial order does not have to include a clean break at all.

The Court hopes that the couple will negotiate a fair agreement.

Karen Elliott

Karen Elliott: Divorce specialist

An agreement on financial issues does not become binding until it has been approved by the court. This means for there to be finality – there needs to be a consent order (or an order made by the court after hearing evidence and without consent).

However, the court will not simply rubber stamp any agreement that is reached between the couple and which the court is asked to approve.

The court retains a discretionary role under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and the corresponding provisions of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). The court will therefore consider whether the agreement represents fair and proper financial provision for the parties in all the circumstances of the case.

The court must be given specified information to enable it to exercise its discretion under MCA 1973, s 25. (See our page on the section 25 criteria)

The Court cannot lawfully exercise its powers without full details of both parties’ circumstances. For this reason, every draft consent order sent to the court to be approved must be accompanied by an additional form which summarises the financial situation and proposed living arrangements of the family.

Kris Seed: Divorce specialist

The financial consent order is a legal document and would ordinarily be drafted by solicitors (even if the negotiations have taken place through mediation or directly between the couple).

Drafting

The President of the Family Division (the most senior family Judge) has issued guidance as to the use of a standard set of precedents. These precedents are used by lawyers when drafting financial consent orders. They provide a helpful and standardised starting point. Different precedents will apply in different circumstances. The precedents can also be adapted to ensure that the order will give effect to what the couple have agreed.

Recitals and undertakings

The first part of a draft order will normally contain what are known as recitals and undertakings.

Recitals and undertakings may be used to cover issues that the court could not otherwise order.

Recitals can provide an explanation of the basis upon which the court order is made. The recitals can include preliminary agreements between the couple.

David Howell-Richardson

David Howell-Richardson: Divorce Specialist

The Court does not have the power to order anything that is requested. The court only has the power to order what Parliament has decided that it can order. This would include things like the transfer or sale of the property or the payment of a lump sum order or the payment of maintenance by one of the couple to the other. Orders can also be made about pensions. Since the introduction of the Child Support Agency (now the Child Maintenance Service) the Court’s powers in respect of child maintenance are restricted.

An undertaking is a promise made to the court. This is a formal promise. Breach of an undertaking can result in a fine or imprisonment for contempt of court.

They should be in clear terms and the implications of giving an undertaking should be fully explained. Where possible, the order should be signed by both parties and always where the order includes undertakings given by that party.

Clean break

Although there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so that the financial obligations of parties towards each other can be terminated.

On exercising its powers, under the Matrimonial Causes Act the Court must consider how the financial obligations of each party towards the other will be terminated as soon after the final decree of divorce as the court considers just and reasonable.

Kris Seed: Divorce specialist

Financial disclosure

The court requires a summary of the financial circumstances of the family before it will consider whether or not to approve a financial consent order. It is therefore not surprising that financial disclosure is a fundamentally important feature in any negotiations. Delay by one or other of the couple in providing full financial disclosure will inevitably cause delays in negotiation – and if one of the couple refuses to provide disclosure – they can expect the other to make an application to the Court. The Court will make orders to require financial information to be provided.

If one of the couple ask their solicitor to draft a financial consent order when there has not been full financial disclosure – they can expect the solicitor to refuse or to ask them to sign a disclaimer – which will say that the client accepts that it is their own fault if they have been misled and if the agreement is a bad one.

Variation of financial consent orders

Whilst financial orders are intended to be final – or provide a framework for finality – in certain circumstances orders can be varied or discharged and suspended or revived by the Court. This is not simply financial consent orders but also financial orders which would have been made by the court after hearing evidence.

There is insufficient space here to go into the circumstances where it would be appropriate for there to be variation of a financial consent order/financial order.

If you have a financial order and there has been a difficulty with its implementation or where it has become apparent that there has been nondisclosure, or where something is happened which means there is a complete change in circumstances – then the best thing to do is to get in touch for some specific advice.

Bridget Garrood; Divorce specialist

Drafting Orders (two)

Because a financial consent order is a legal document it is always best for the document to be drafted by lawyer.

If the order is being drafted to give effect to what has been agreed by a couple without legal advice – then expect the lawyer to want to know what financial disclosure there has been and to give advice as to whether there should be financial disclosure/due diligence – to make sure that what is being proposed is reasonable.

If the Court doesn’t approve a Draft Financial Consent Order

If the court is of the view that the contents of a draft financial consent order are not sufficiently fair then the first step is for the Court to ask for more information. The court may also ask the parties (and their lawyers) to attend the hearing to justify what is being proposed. Ultimately – even with a hearing the court does not have to approve what is put before it.

This discretion is one of the strengths of the divorce law in England and Wales.

Notice to show cause

If one of the couple considers that an agreement has been reached (usually in relation to financial arrangements between the parties), or an agreement was made but one party seeks to resile from it, the party relying on an agreement reached between the parties may make an application for the other party to show cause why an order should not be made in the terms of the agreement.

Lack of financial disclosure or legal advice can be perfectly good reasons not to be held to an agreement reached directly between a couple.

Legal advice is essential

Therefore, getting legal advice at an early stage is always a good idea.

Latest News

Some good news for family court delays

Last week the President of the Family Division Sir Andrew McFarlane spoke at a conference on the future of family practice online, organised by Resolution, the association of family lawyers. He had some interesting, and perhaps somewhat

Read more
Ten commonly asked questions about divorce

Anyone contemplating divorce will inevitably have a lot of questions to ask. As any experienced family lawyer will confirm, many of those questions crop up over and over again. This post is intended to provide quick answers to some of the m

Read more
Can I take my child to a different part of the country after I separate?

It is not uncommon that, after they separate, parents might want to move to different parts of the country, some considerable distance away from each other. This might, for example, be because the parents originate from different parts

Read more
Judge warns parties to resolve trivial issues out of court

In family law matters little issues arise all the time. This is especially so in relation to arrangements for children, as we will see in a moment, but they can also arise in relation to other matters...

Read more
We are now recognised by the Legal 500

Recognised by the Legal 500. We are very pleased to learn that we have been recognised in 2021 in edition of the Legal 500 as a leading firm for family law.

Read more
Just how much has the pandemic affected the workload of the Family Court?

Like almost every other aspect of life in this country, the family justice system has been affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. But just how busy are the courts now, six months after lockdown began?

Read more
Legal Services Board publishes report on legal costs

The Legal Services Board (’LSB’), the oversight regulator of legal services in England and Wales, has published a report examining prices for commonly used legal services. This is the third time the LSB has surveyed legal charges

Read more
We are Recruiting: Family Law Solicitor / Head of Family Mediation

We are seeking a family solicitor and mediator to join our team. Family Mediation Council or Law Society Accreditation desirable but not essential as we can provide a route to accreditation You will lead the mediation team

Read more
Is there going to be a spike in divorce cases when lockdown ends?

Ever since the country entered into lockdown there have been warnings about the effect of lockdown on relationships, and the possibility that when it finally ends there will be a spike in divorce cases. Now Citizens Advice have added their.

Read more
Is an arbitration award final?

If you are involved in divorce proceedings you may be considering using arbitration to sort out the financial settlement. Arbitration involves both parties instructing an arbitrator to decide the case for them, rather than have the matter

Read more
What happens to pensions on divorce?

It is a common scenario that on divorce one party will have significant pension provision, and the other party will have little or none. Clearly, this may be a relevant factor in any divorce settlement, but how exactly are pensions dealt wi

Read more
Welcome to Sarah Hindle – Child Law Expert / Head of our Child Law Team

We are very pleased to welcome Child Law specialist solicitor, Sarah Hindle to our team as Head of our Child Law Team. Sarah has joined us from the leading London Child Law team of Bindmans LLP. Sarah’s legal career has been mostly in London, including  with other leading Child Law firms;  Creighton & Partners and […]

Read more