Ian Walker

Ian Walker – Child Law Specialist Solicitor and Mediator

Residence Orders

The Children Act 1989 introduced Residence and Contact Orders.

Residence Orders determined where a child resided (lived).

Contact Orders determined when and how a child spent time with a parent and other important family members who they were not residing with.

Before Residence there was Custody

Residence Orders and Contact Orders replaced Custody Orders and Access Orders. The orders did the same thing, but the terminology of Residence and Contact was different, and also an improvement.

legal 500 leading firm logoThe idea of the Children Act was very much to modernise the law relating to children. This revised terminology was significantly more child focused and a vast improvement.

The problem with access and custody was that the terminology kind of suggested that a child was imprisoned or owned by one parent and the other parent was lucky to be able to access time with them. Also, the terminology was framed in a very adult way…. An adult had custody of the child; an adult had access to the child. Critics said that terminology suggested that the adult was more important than the child.

Placing the child first

The terminology for Residence and Contact Orders made clear that the child was centre stage. Now orders were framed with the child as the most important person (in line with other aspects of the Children Act). The child has contact with… The child resides with…

As well as the welfare principle (which is that the child’s welfare is the most important consideration in any decision making), the Children Act also contains the no order principle.

The No Order Principle

The No Order Principle of the Children Act says;

When the court is considering whether or not to make one or more orders under the Children Act 1989 with respect to a child, it must not make the order unless it considers that doing so would be better for the child than making no order at all.

Note the use of the word must.

The underlying idea was to encourage parents to talk and to agree arrangements rather than the default position being that the parents needed to have a court order which set out what their arrangements would be.

Joint Custody

Pre-Children Act Orders were often that parents would have joint custody of their children and/or that one parent had custody of the children and the other parent had reasonable access.

The no order principle remains in place, but over time there was increasing pressure for joint residence orders. Whilst terminology is important – the importance to parents as a point of contention as to who had residence (a residence order) and who had contact (only contact),(and why not joint residence?) started to become a distraction. They original point of the no order principle was to encourage parents to sort out reasonable arrangements without having to involve the court.

The Children and Families Act 2014

In April 2014 the Children and Families Act 2014 came into effect. This amended the Children Act.

In particular the Children and Families Act 2014 removed from the Children Act the definitions of residence order and contact order. Residence and Contact Orders were replaced by Child Arrangement Orders.

A Child Arrangement Orders is an order relating to:

whom a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with, and

when a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with any person

Child Arrangement Orders will say that a child lives with one parent and spends time with the other parent. But a child arrangements order can also say that a child lives with one parent (in a defined way) and then lives with the other parent (in another defined way). A child living with both parents under a child arrangements order does not mean 50/50 time (although it could do).

Children living with both parents for different periods of time in a week reflects the reality/practicalities of life but is much less likely to diminish (in the eyes of one or both parents) the importance of the parent with whom the child spends less time. Even with Residence and Contact Orders the parents who had Residence could use the tag of residence to diminish the role of the other parent (in circumstances where the parents could and should be working together).

Residence Orders are no more

So, Residence Orders are no more.

Language is important and the move to Child Arrangements Orders has been a step forward.

Our team are specialists in Children Law. If you need any assistance we are ready to help

Latest News

Parental alienation in the news again

The difficult subject of parental alienation has been back in the news this week, featuring both in a television documentary and a national newspaper opinion piece.

Read more
Financial remedies: don’t help yourself to your spouse’s documents

It is often the case that when someone is getting divorced, or when their marriage is breaking down, they still have access to their spouse’s private financial documents, whether physical documents, or documents held on a computer.

Read more
Will family mediation become mandatory?

Mediation is a form of dispute resolution, alternative to court proceedings (such alternatives to court are known as ‘alternative dispute resolution’ or ADR). Mediation consists of the parties meeting with a trained mediator, who will help

Read more
The Resolutions Model: getting a child back from care

The Resolutions Model is the name given to an arrangement whereby a child may be returned to their parent, despite the fact that the parent denies causing an injury to the child or its sibling.

Read more
Domestic Abuse Commissioner calls for more support for abuse victims

A new report has revealed that 89 per cent of domestic abuse survivors don’t get any support when they go through the family courts. The report was prepared by SafeLives, a UK-wide charity dedicated to ending domestic abuse, and commission

Read more
Welcome Paul Sykes – Leading Children Law Solicitor

Paul is one of the Leading Children Law Solicitor in the South West and has spent his entire legal career with Somerset based solicitors. Paul is particularly well known and respected by all family law practitioners in Somerset.

Read more
We are recruiting – Business Development Manager/ Marketing Manager/ (Full Time) – Fantastic Opportunity

Despite the very significant challenges in the wider world, the last 18 months have seen us grow from being a small to medium size legal practice. In this time we have significantly strengthened our legal team and turnover has doubled.

Read more
A further illustration of the consequences of lying to the court

It is a common complaint in family proceedings, especially financial remedy cases sorting out finances on divorce, that the other party has ‘got away’ with lying to the court. It is true that the family court will not always take action in

Read more
Important changes to child maintenance system proposed

The payment of child maintenance is one of the biggest issues of contention between separated parents, affecting huge numbers of children. Over the years the government has made various attempts to improve and perfect the child maintenance

Read more
Courts Service sets out role of remote hearings

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (‘HMCTS’), which is responsible for the administration of criminal, civil and family courts and tribunals in England and Wales, has given an indication of the role of remote court hearings

Read more
No-fault divorce delayed until 2022

The Government has announced that the new system of no-fault divorce, which it had previously indicated would come into force in the autumn, will not now do so until spring next year.

Read more
Large increase in new-born babies subject to care proceedings

New research has found that there has been a large increase in the number of new-born babies (i.e. babies under 2 weeks old) in England and Wales subject to care proceedings.

Read more